Chinese expert warns Philippines not to mistake humanitarian accommodation for concession as Philippine military twists facts on Ren’ai Jiao resupply_我的网站
A | 爆炸发生后，全世界的天体物理学家都把他们的望远镜转向了这场壮观的“表演”，从各种宇宙的有利位置观察它的发展。  Chinese experts warned on Wednesday that Manila should not mistake humanitarian accommodation for a concession and must bear the consequences if it scraps the arrangement. Yang Xiao, a research fellow at the Institute of Peaceful Development under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Wednesday that the Philippine side's claims are fundamentally flawed from legal, historical and practical perspectives. Ren'ai Jiao is an inherent part of China's Nansha Qundao, over which China has indisputable and complete sovereignty, Yang said, adding that it is legally untenable for the Philippines to claim that Ren'ai Jiao is part of its exclusive economic zone. "The Philippines deliberately grounded the abandoned warship at Ren'ai Jiao in 1999 and repeatedly pledged to remove it and restore the reef, but has failed to honor those commitments for more than two decades. This itself constitutes a continuing violation of China's territorial sovereignty," Yang said. This is not the first time the Philippines has denied seeking China's approval for resupply missions to Ren'ai Jiao. In April 2025, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun responded to similar claims, saying that China's position on how to handle the current situation at Ren'ai Jiao is clear and consistent. "First, by keeping its warship grounded at Ren'ai Jiao for decades running, the Philippines has been violating China's sovereignty and the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC). We demand that the Philippines tow away the warship. Second, between now and when the warship is towed away, should the Philippines need to send living necessities, China is willing to allow it in a humanitarian spirit if the Philippines informs China in advance and after on-site verification is conducted. Third, if the Philippines were to send large amount of construction materials to the warship and attempt to build fixed facilities or permanent outpost, China will absolutely not accept it and will resolutely stop it in accordance with the law and regulations," said the spokesperson. "This means that the Philippines' so-called '15 safe and incident-free resupply missions' were all made possible by China's humanitarian accommodation and strict oversight," Yang stressed. Each mission was reported in advance and allowed to proceed only after inspections confirmed no prohibited construction materials were aboard. The CCG intercepted any such materials through lawful measures, Yang said. The Philippines' unilateral denial of its notification and inspection obligations while enjoying the arrangement's benefits amounts to a blatant breach of its commitments, the expert noted. Yang also noted that Manila's narrative contains an obvious logical contradiction. If Philippine resupply missions were truly unimpeded, there would be no need for Manila to repeatedly claim that China had "blocked" its missions and call for international intervention. Yet if China had continuously "obstructed" the missions, the Philippines could not have completed 15 safe and incident-free resupply operations. "Manila has simply manipulated its narrative to suit its publicity needs, portraying itself as a 'victim' when seeking international attention while touting smooth resupply operations and its own strength when seeking to project toughness. Its hype over the 15 resupply missions is essentially aimed at rallying domestic support and stoking confrontation internationally to conceal the reality that its illegal presence is tightly constrained," Yang said. China's handling of the Ren'ai Jiao situation, meanwhile, has consistently reflected restraint and humanitarian considerations. According to a statement by the China Coast Guard (CCG) spokesperson on the transfer of injured personnel by the Philippine side, Jiang Lue, a CCG spokesperson, said that on the morning of July 21, out of humanitarian considerations, China allowed the Philippines to transfer injured personnel by small boats from the BRP Sierra Madre (LT-57), which has been illegally grounded at Ren'ai Jiao, to Philippine Coast Guard vessel 9702. The CCG questioned and verified the Philippine vessels and monitored the entire process. The CCG will continue to carry out rights-protection and law enforcement operations in accordance with the law in the waters around Ren'ai Jiao to safeguard China's territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests, Jiang said. Yang said, stressing that Manila's tough talk and one-sided claims cannot make up for its legal and moral shortcomings. "Any attempt to permanently occupy Chinese islands and reefs, unilaterally tear up the understanding and continuously challenge China's territorial sovereignty runs counter to international law and the broader trend toward peace and development in the region and is ultimately doomed to fail," Yang added. 。在接下来的一周里，当他们警惕地研究这个事件的闪亮的余辉时，他们对这个伽马射线暴似乎是如此的完全明亮感到震惊。最终，这个奇观的纯粹强度为它赢得了一个合适的名字，以配合它的机器人名称GRB221009A：B.O.A.T.--“有史以来最亮的”。
B | 美国西北大学的天文学家Jillian Rastinejad在一份声明中说：“这个GRB是一个非常罕见的事件。
C | "它是如此之亮，以至于它两次触发了Swift 伽马射线望远镜，并使探测器完全饱和--这是我在观察伽马射线源的过程中从未见过的。”那么，这个破纪录的爆发的根源是什么？科学家们推断，也许是一些同样令人费解的极端现象。截至目前，主要的假设是这个GRB是由一颗古老的恒星在转变为一个巨大的黑洞时死亡产生的。这里的想法是，在遥远的宇宙中，一颗巨大的超新星可能刺激了一个黑洞的诞生，而众所周知，黑洞会喷出几乎以光速飞行的最高粒子射流，也许这个黑洞的射流会将其内容喷向地球。马里兰大学的天体物理学家Brendan O'Connor在一份声明中说：“我们认为这是一个百年一遇的机会，可以解决有关这些爆炸的一些最基本的问题，从黑洞的形成到暗物质模型的测试，”他帮助最初观察了GRB。
D | 此外，如果这个爆发真的像科学家们想象的那样与深渊的起源有关，它可以为我们提供宝贵的见解，了解物质在接近光速时的表现，恒星如何坍缩到难以想象的密集空隙中，以及在更广泛的意义上，在我们自己的星系之外的星系中可能是什么情况--B.O.A.T.诞生的遥远境界。然而，值得一提的是，每一个参与研究这个GRB的人在做出最后的原因声明之前都是超级谨慎的。研究小组仍在观察该事件的“余辉”，以确定死星；黑洞理论是否站得住脚。“鉴于大多数其他长GRB是由大质量恒星坍缩造成的，我们完全有理由相信，我们将找到超新星的直接证据，”Rastinejad说。
E | “但是这将需要更多的工作和时间来确认，而且宇宙可能总是让我们感到惊讶。”GRB也可能与其他宇宙奇观有关。例如，持续时间较短的GRB只有几分之一秒，往往来自于中子星的碰撞--恒星体的碰撞。
F | 不过，从好的方面来看，由于这个GRB非常明亮，而且处于起步阶段，科学家们希望能够对它进行几个月的监测。一个月后，Rastinejad预计该事件的证据将消失在太阳后面，但是一旦它在明年初再次出现，他说：“我们将兴奋地看到GRB是一个混乱的'幼儿'。然后，我们将准备好并等待用相机捕捉它。”“这个GRB的破纪录性质在很大程度上重振了更大的观测界，”Rasinejad说。“每个人--甚至那些通常不研究GRB的人--都试图将他们的探测器对准它。作为其中的一员，看着这个故事如何展开，这是一件美丽而超现实的事情。”一方面，美国宇航局在国际空间站上的仪器，如NICER X射线望远镜和一个被称为轨道高能监测警报网的日本探测器都参与其中。然后有两个独立的团队，一个由Rastinejad领导，另一个由O'Connor领导，利用智利的地面双子座南望远镜。
G | 而这只是触及了谁在盯着这个电爆的表面。虽然每周都会捕捉到几次爆炸性的GRB爆发，但西北大学的天体物理学家方文辉（音译）强调说："只要我们能够探测到GRB，毫无疑问，这个GRB是我们所见过的最亮的GRB，是10倍以上的。"同样令人好奇的是，这样的高能射线能够在长达24亿年的旅程中幸存下来，首先到达我们的星球。正如美国国家科学基金会的NOIR实验室所说的那样，科学家们想知道这个爆发所发出的粒子是如何"违背我们对物理学的标准理解"的。为了弄清这一切，很有希望的是，科学家们认为这个爆发比你的普通GRB更接近地球。这意味着我们可以从它那里收集到很多细节，否则可能会因为太过微弱而无法看到。意大利巴里理工大学的天体物理学家Roberta Pillera在一份声明中说：“尽管这种接近也可能部分地解释了为什么它对我们来说显得如此发光，但无论距离远近，它也是有史以来能量最强和最发光的爆发之一，这使它变得更加令人兴奋。”正如美国宇航局简单总结的那样，“另一个如此明亮的GRB可能在几十年内不会出现。
H | Current article:http://dn7r.yofateeikengyeche.cfd/news/20260826_889.html Published on:21:19:44 |
